If Text Then Code

  • About the Course
    • Course Goals
    • Course Modules
  • Important Information
    • Contact Me
    • Policies
  • Schedule
  • Assignments
    • Reflection Posts
      • Prompt #1
      • Prompt #2
      • Prompt #3
    • “Found Text” Abstracts
    • Build Your Own Website
    • Write Your Own Text Adventure Game
    • Publish Your Own Digital Edition
    • Final Project
    • Rubrics
  • Resources
    • Readings
    • Tool Kit
    • Tutorials & Exercises
  • Reflections

You are here: Home / Rubrics

Rubrics

Each assignment will have its own rubric, considering particular competencies and expectations for that work.

TEI: Linn Letter Module 3 Assignment

Final assignment for Module 3 on TEI.
CategoryRationalePoints
Markup ProficiencyHow comprehensive is the markup? Does the markup approach demonstrate an understanding of the process? Are all required tags included?45
StructureDoes the marked up file reflect an understanding of how the letter functions as a document to be read? What does the document look like in a web browser?35
Comprehension and supportAre unfamiliar words properly defined? Does the summary demonstrate the encoder’s understanding of the letter? Is the letter linked properly from the journal file on GitHub?20

Module 2 (Text Adventure) Rubric

There are several components of this assignment that add up to 15% of your course grade. Three components (The text narrative assignment, peer & self evaluation, and player response are all individual completion marks worth 2 pts. each for a total of 6 points). The Game itself will be a collective group grade worth 9 pts and evaluated as follows:
CategoryRationalePoints
Code proficiencyDoes the game code actually work? Is it clean? Is it sufficiently annotated to explain coding decisions that were made by the group?35 pts.
Game playIs the game fun to play? Are the plot and characters well articulated and engaging? Does the game make sense from a player reception point of view?35 pts.
StructureIs the text of the game properly structured, standard English? Does the game text reveal spelling, grammar, and punctuation competency?30 pts.

Module 1 (Build Your Own Website) Rubric

I will evaluate the reflection essays according to the following 100 point scale. (This rubric is adapted from those used by Marion L. Brittain Fellows in Georgia Tech's Writing and Communication program):
CategoryRationalePoints
Rhetorical AwarenessProject considers audience, persona, message, and medium15 pts.
Stance and SupportCentral claim is duly supported by evidence10 pts.
OrganizationClear structure logically moves within website pages25 pts.
StructureComponent adherence to usage standards; skillful integration and citation of sources20 pts.
Design for MediumWell-chosen design features enhance audience motivation and participation30 pts.

Reflection Post Rubric

I will evaluate the reflection essays according to the following 0-4 point scale. (This rubric is adapted by one developed by Mark Sample and used widely in DH courses):
RATINGCHARACTERISTICS
4Exceptional. The post is focused and coherently integrates examples with explanations or analysis. The post demonstrates awareness of its own limitations or implications, and it considers multiple perspectives when appropriate. The post includes at least one rhetorically useful image or media clip that illustratesu2014rather than trivializesu2014its point. The source and context of the image or media clip is also indicated.
3Satisfactory. The post is reasonably focused, and explanations or analysis are mostly based on examples or other evidence. Fewer connections are made between ideas, and though new insights are offered, they are not fully developed. The post reflects moderate engagement with the topic.
2Underdeveloped. The post is mostly description or summary, without consideration of alternative perspectives, and few connections are made between ideas. The entry reflects passing engagement with the topic.
1Limited. The post is unfocused, or simply rehashes previous comments, and displays no evidence of student engagement with the topic.
0No Credit. The post is missing, late, or consists of one or two disconnected sentences.

HUMN 271

Bertrand 012
TR 9:30-11:20am
Dr. Diane Jakacki

Authors

  • Dale Hartman RSS feed
  • Diane Jakacki RSS feed
  • ejp013 RSS feed
  • Ella Ekstrom RSS feed
  • jaa023 RSS feed
  • Jingya Wu RSS feed
  • Julia Wigginton RSS feed
  • Matthew Fay RSS feed
  • Matthew Lucas RSS feed
  • Neil Lin RSS feed
  • Peter Onusconich RSS feed
  • Sarah Rosecky RSS feed
  • Tong Tong RSS feed
  • Xing Fu RSS feed
  • Yash Mittal RSS feed

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License Bucknell University Humanities 271 Course by Diane Jakacki is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2023 · eleven40 Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in